STRAIN DISTRIBUTION ON A CURVED BEAM: DIC VS. FEM

WHY CHOOSE X-SIGHT?

  • Strain analysis software Alpha – simple to use but complex in features
  • Strain easily measurable anywhere on the specimen’s visible surface
  • Versatile real-time measurements and powerful post-processing

TOOLS, POSTPROCESSING AND RESULTS

The DIC Area tool was used at the location with the highest bending moment to capture the full-field axial strain distribution.

In addition, a FEM calculation was performed with boundary conditions that faithfully represent the test setup. The results obtained by both methods correspond very well both qualitatively and quantitatively. The crack probe was used to obtain the line strain distribution in the maximum bending moment area along the section perpendicular to the axis of curvature of the sample.

The probe creates an arbitrary number of line probes perpendicular to the line that connects the starting and ending point of the probe (distinctly purple in the image).

The result graph shows a good match between the DIC and FEM results, including the hyperbolic shape of the curve, which is predicted by the available theory.

2
DIC Area showing axial strain distribution
3
FEM submodel showing axial (Y) strain distribution in the equivalent area
4
Crack probe to obtain the strain curve

🗎 Download PDF version of this report here

Scroll to Top